Questions 8 and 9 of the social studies questionnaire (see blog post Wednesday 20th October) forced you to think back to your primary years to consider the affects that social studies education had on you as an individual then and now.
Question 8 presents a broad range of possible feelings you could have had about learning in social studies. It implied that these feelings were closely related to the objectives of social studies and reflected the broad scope of concepts that can fit under the social studies learning area umbrella. Evidently, this large scope of social studies education is also the cause for uncertainty and disagreements over what should be most important in this learning area. Effectively, differing views of what it means to be a 'good' citizen, the goal of social studies, has been the causal of this large scope.
Question 9 presented the 'active citizen' and asked if you felt social studies education had given you efficacy in this area. However, even if the answer you gave was a 'strongly agree' this does not necessarily prove you are a 'good' citizen when considering the several social studies orientations presented in Gibson & McKay (2005) which all focus on different aspects for effective citizenship.
The aim of this post is to describe a number of these orientations and their correlating views of citizenship in a bid to unravel the goals of education, and how teachers must balance a number of factors that inform these goals in the classroom. When analysing the data from the questionnaire we will be able to discover whether your past teachers were considering this need for balancing a number of social studies orientations for effective citizenship rather than just one.
